Design-for-manufacturability review to reduce cost, improve yield, and speed up quoting and production—especially for bent and welded assemblies

Bend rules review (radius, relief, interference) Hole-to-edge and feature spacing checks for manufacturability Tolerance strategy suggestions aligned with function Weld sequence and distortion control recommendations Finish/appearance requirements translated into manufacturable specs

Standard: DFM feedback during quoting to confirm feasibility and reduce obvious risks. Extended: deeper optimization (cost-down alternatives, routing redesign, assembly/finish planning) supported on request, strictly per drawing and project scope.

Mark cosmetic faces and functional interfaces clearly Specify critical tolerances only where function requires Provide mating part context (where does it fit?) for better suggestions Confirm finish requirements and masking early Use STEP + 2D PDF to avoid interpretation errors

Inspection per drawing requirements Reports available upon request (FAI/COC, etc.)

STEP/IGES + dimensioned PDF Material + thickness + target quantity range Key fit interfaces and critical-to-quality features Finish/cosmetic requirements Welding requirements (if applicable) Any compliance/testing needs (if applicable)

Q: Is DFM included in the quote process? A: Often yes for feasibility; deeper optimization is available on request. Q: Can you suggest cost-down alternatives? A: Yes—process/material/finish trade-offs can be proposed based on your goals. Q: What do you need for a DFM review? A: STEP + PDF, material/thickness, quantity range, and critical features. Q: Will DFM change my part function? A: Recommendations aim to preserve function while improving manufacturability—final decision is yours.